For years there seemed to be just one single trustworthy path to store information on a personal computer – working with a hard drive (HDD). Nevertheless, this sort of technology is by now demonstrating it’s age – hard disk drives are actually loud and slow; they’re power–hungry and are likely to generate a lot of warmth in the course of serious procedures.

SSD drives, however, are fast, use up significantly less power and are also far less hot. They offer a new approach to file accessibility and storage and are years ahead of HDDs in relation to file read/write speed, I/O operation and then power efficacy. Find out how HDDs fare up against the more recent SSD drives.

1. Access Time

After the introduction of SSD drives, file access speeds have gone through the roof. With thanks to the unique electronic interfaces found in SSD drives, the normal file access time has shrunk towards a record low of 0.1millisecond.

HDD drives make use of rotating disks for files storage applications. Every time a file will be used, you will have to await the right disk to get to the appropriate place for the laser beam to reach the data file involved. This results in a standard access rate of 5 to 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

The random I/O performance is really important for the efficiency of any data file storage device. We have conducted extensive trials and have identified an SSD can handle at the very least 6000 IO’s per second.

With a HDD drive, the I/O performance gradually enhances the more you employ the hard drive. Even so, right after it gets to a certain limit, it can’t get speedier. And due to the now–old technology, that I/O restriction is a lot less than what you can receive with an SSD.

HDD are only able to go as much as 400 IO’s per second.

3. Reliability

The absence of moving parts and spinning disks in SSD drives, and also the latest developments in electronic interface technology have ended in a considerably better data storage device, with an normal failure rate of 0.5%.

HDD drives make use of spinning hard disks for storing and browsing data – a technology going back to the 1950s. And with disks magnetically hanging in mid–air, rotating at 7200 rpm, the prospect of something failing are considerably higher.

The average rate of failure of HDD drives varies among 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

SSD drives are much smaller compared to HDD drives and also they lack any kind of moving parts at all. Because of this they don’t produce as much heat and need considerably less power to function and fewer power for chilling purposes.

SSDs take in between 2 and 5 watts.

HDD drives are well known for becoming loud; they are prone to heating up and whenever you have several hard drives within a server, you’ll want one more air conditioning system simply for them.

In general, HDDs consume somewhere between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

The faster the data file access speed is, the quicker the data demands will likely be handled. Consequently the CPU do not need to arrange allocations waiting for the SSD to reply back.

The normal I/O delay for SSD drives is merely 1%.

As compared to SSDs, HDDs enable slower data accessibility speeds. The CPU will need to wait for the HDD to send back the demanded data, saving its assets in the meantime.

The average I/O delay for HDD drives is around 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

It’s time for several real–world instances. We, at QTLabs Inc., produced a full platform backup with a web server using only SSDs for file storage purposes. During that process, the common service time for any I/O demand kept beneath 20 ms.

During the same trials with the same hosting server, this time around fitted out with HDDs, general performance was substantially slower. Throughout the server back up procedure, the standard service time for I/O requests fluctuated somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

One more real–life enhancement is the rate with which the data backup was created. With SSDs, a hosting server backup today takes no more than 6 hours implementing our server–enhanced software solutions.

Over the years, we have got worked with primarily HDD drives on our servers and we’re knowledgeable of their effectiveness. On a hosting server pre–loaded with HDD drives, a full web server back up may take about 20 to 24 hours.

If you want to instantaneously raise the efficiency of your websites and not having to adjust just about any code, an SSD–driven website hosting service will be a good choice. Examine QTLabs Inc.’s cloud web hosting plans – these hosting solutions highlight swift SSD drives and are available at the best prices.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • All of our Virtual Private Servers provide no setup costs and work in a secure network providing 99.9% of uptime. Full root access to the server guaranteed.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Very easily review the quotas and characteristics supplied by QTLabs Inc.’s Virtual Private Servers. Discover exactly which VPS setup will give you just what you will need to handle your multi–media web presence effortlessly.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • You’re able to make contact with us round the clock by email or by utilizing our super–fast ticketing platform. Our company offers a 1–hour reply–back time frame warranty.